
This spring, Harvard Law Professor Lawrence Lessig is kicking off a series of talks on college campuses across the country, and he's calling for American citizens to unite to Ctrl+Alt+Del the system so it can truly be "one person one vote."
He's developed a new presentation on the crisis in our democracy, illustrating the connection between special interest money and critical policy decisions -- and showing why past promises of reform have gone nowhere.
You can watch it here:
Learn How You Can Help Support The Fair Elections Now Act!
How to Sober Up Washington
By Lawrence Lessig and Mark McKinnon
Washington is hopelessly addicted to money and thus to the status quo; drunk with power and incapable of getting sober and fixing itself. It's time for an intervention -- by the states.
Politically, we two disagree on just about everything. But the one thing we do agree on is that the institutions of government in Washington have become corrupt, held hostage by well-funded special interests. It's no wonder that only 17 percent of the American public in a recent Gallup survey said they had a favorable opinion of Congress. American voters believe, and rightly so, that corporations, labor unions and moneyed special interests have a chokehold on politicians. Voters are disillusioned and discouraged because they don't believe Washington represents the will of the people. And the recent Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. F.E.C. -- which permits unlimited independent corporate campaign expenditures -- will only make this worse. If we are to break this dependency which holds our nation hostage, we're not going to do it in Washington. We've got to start handing out pitchforks in the states.
And so too many throw up their hands and say, "We give up. Congress won't fix itself. And there's nothing that we can do about it."
But there is something we can do. We, the People, can take back the power we gave to Congress. We can take it back through the states.
The framers left open a path to amendment that doesn't require the approval of Congress: a convention. Article V of the Constitution requires Congress to call a convention to propose amendments if 34 state legislatures demand it. Any proposed amendment would then have to be ratified by both houses of 38 state legislatures (three-fourths of the states). This entails 76 separate votes in the affirmative by two houses of 38 state legislatures. (Nebraska, with its unicameral legislature, would be an exception.)
Easy to do? No. But possible? Certainly, yes. There hasn't been a time when there has been such anger and frustration directed at our nation's capitol. There hasn't been a moment when the opportunity to organize to build a movement among the states has been as real. The beauty of a convention is that it would provide a forum of possibility for conservative Tea Party types who might want an amendment calling for a balanced budget, or a line-item veto for the president as well as progressives who would like to amend the constitution to make it possible to enact meaningful campaign finance reform. The only requirement is that two-thirds of the states apply, and then begins the drama of an unscripted national convention to debate questions of fundamental law. It would be a grand circus of democracy at its best.
Even if 34 states don't call for a convention, history teaches that a real threat is often enough to get Congress to act. The only amendment in our history that changed the structure of Congress (the 17th, making the Senate an elected body) was proposed by Congress because the states were close (just one state short) to calling for a convention. If nothing else, the possibility of a body they can't control is enough to get Congress to pay attention.
Some will resist the idea of a convention because they fear a "runaway" in which fringe elements would take over the agenda and propose radical amendments. But the framers anticipated such a danger and established a very high bar against it. Amendments are ratified by legislatures (or state conventions), not by referenda. And if even one chamber in 12 state legislatures refused to ratify an amendment, it would die. There will always be twelve solid blue states and twelve solid red states in America. There's thus no danger that one extreme can overtake the other.
Conventional wisdom will argue that constitutional conventions or amendments are just impossible. Just like it was impossible to wrest a republic from the grip of monarchy or abolish slavery. Or impossible to elect Ronald Reagan or Barack Obama. But conventional minds are always wrong about pivotal moments in a nation's history. And this is a pivotal moment in ours, when a movement to restore democracy is possible.
Indeed, the movement has already begun. Legislators in South Carolina, Virginia, Oregon, Rhode Island and Florida are already throwing sparks that could soon become a brush fire across the country. More and more are coming to see that if reform is necessary -- as most all of us, whether from the right or left believe -- this is the only way.
Congress has perfected the art of defending the status quo because it is dependent -- for its campaign funds -- upon the status quo. If we are to break this dependency which holds our nation hostage, we're not going to do it in Washington. We've got to start handing out pitchforks in the states and organize a national convention. From there we will scale the federal ramparts and regain some sense and accountability.
Please pass this along and share it on Twitter or Facebook so we can keep building momentum for change we can perceive.
good job. You may want to say why Obama HC is give away to Insurance Companies. My understanding is the Insurance Companies are Exempt from Antitrust Law which was given to them in 1945 by Antitrust Exemption Law. Insurance Companies do not have to compete with each other. Obama meet secretly with HC Executive few weeks after he toke the office and basically asked them with the help of Senate Finance Committee Chairman (Senator Max Baucus), to write a HC Bill. Obama HC Bill did not repeal 1945 Antitrust Exemption Law and/or does not have Public Option either to have competition.
ReplyDeleteObama Bill does not do anything to reduce the cost of HC Insurance. Obama’s Bill force us to buy Insurance from Privet Insurance Co. which give them 35 to 45 million new customers and Taxing us up to 40% of Insurance
Cost (He called it Cadillac Insurance).
If you understood anything about health insurance you would see the stupidity of your comments. There won't be health insurance unless everyone participates. Learn what risk is and stay away from the teabaggers.
ReplyDeleteI think you need to put a link to the Ctrl-Alt-Del movement so people can get involved-- I don't see it here...
ReplyDeleteGood call politzo, I just made the Fix Congress First logo at the top of linked to their website. Did you watch the presentation? I love the call your representative feature. I'm going to call Florida's representatives when I find some time today or tomorrow.
ReplyDeletehttp://act.fixcongressfirst.org/viewall
ReplyDeleteObamacare = True Bipartisanship as Obama promised during his campaign! Only problem is that the bipartisanship was on the NAY side, and NO bipartisanship on the YEA side...typical politics here.
ReplyDeleteOnly problem is the special interests are the only interests being protected in Washington.
ReplyDeleteWe can change that by changing who gets to represent us.
Very well done. Will share.
ReplyDelete