Friday, March 19, 2010

The Meaning of Liberty: Returning a Nation to its People

In his farewell address, President Jimmy Carter stated:
We live in a time of transition, an uneasy era which is likely to endure for the rest of this century. It will be a period of tensions both within nations and between nations -- of competition for scarce resources, of social political and economic stresses and strains. During this period we may be tempted to abandon some of the time-honored principles and commitments which have been proven during the difficult times of past generations.

We must never yield to this temptation. Our American values are not luxuries but necessities -- not the salt in our bread but the bread itself. Our common vision of a free and just society is our greatest source of cohesion at home and strength abroad -- greater even than the bounty of our material blessings.

Remember these words:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."

This vision still grips the imagination of the world. But we know that democracy is always an unfinished creation. Each generation must renew its foundations. Each generation must rediscover the meaning of this hallowed vision in the light of its own modern challenges. For this generation, ours, life is nuclear survival; liberty is human rights; the pursuit of happiness is a planet whose resources are devoted to the physical and spiritual nourishment of its inhabitants.

Carter understood all too well the evils that were plaguing America and the obstacles that stood in the path of liberty. But this fading leader's parting words could not stop the thirst for power and control that has plagued this planet since the beginning of human civilization in various forms of government and religion. He could not stop the wrath of unfettered capitalism.



Carter openly left office fearing what was to come, and although he emphasized the need for the next generations to renew the foundations of an unfinished democracy, rather than heed his warning, some willingly, and others more unsuspectingly, actually helped transform our American democracy to a system that thrives on consumption and materialism. A government that Abraham Lincoln once said was created by the people, for the people, into a system, by the people, for these people.

While these past American leaders were separated by roughly a century, both Carter and Lincoln emphasized the importance and meaning of one powerful word in their addresses that many people seem to have lost sight of in such a shallow and materialistic society: Liberty.

Webster defines Liberty as the quality or state of being free; the power to do as one pleases; freedom from physical restraint; freedom from arbitrary or despotic control; and the power of choice. According to Wikipedia, Liberty is a concept of political philosophy and identifies the condition in which an individual has the right to act according to his or her own will. Liberty is synonymous to Freedom.

“Misunderstanding arising from ignorance breeds fear, and fear remains the greatest enemy of peace." - Lester B. Pearson

Our history has demonstrated that many of us have been easily misled and controlled through the use of words like Liberty and Freedom (See Operation Iraqi Freedom). If you disagree, I suggest you just watch a film like Manufacturing Consent or take look at my last blog to see how the powers that be effectively control the masses through the imposition of ignorance and fear.

The misuse of these powerful words within logically flawed beliefs and values is how so many Americans have been able to escape responsibility for their actions; how many have been able to simply ignore whether or not a proposed fear is real or an illusion, and to justify action without any reasoning or common sense. (Updated 3/27/2010: See "Be Scared and Don't Ask Questions")

Historian Lord Acton highlighted this powerful term more than a century ago in the beginning of his address titled, "History of Freedom in Antiquity," which was delivered to the Members of the Bridgnorth in 1877:
Liberty, next to religion has been the motive of good deeds and the common pretext of crime, from the sowing of the seed at Athens, 2,460 years ago, until the ripened harvest was gathered by men of our race. It is the delicate fruit of a mature civilization; and scarcely a century has passed since nations, that knew the meaning of the term, resolved to be free. In every age its progress has been beset by its natural enemies, by ignorance and superstition, by lust of conquest and by love of ease, by the strong man’s craving for power, and the poor man’s craving for food. During long intervals it has been utterly arrested, when nations were being rescued from barbarism and from the grasp of strangers, and when the perpetual struggle for existence, depriving men of all interest and understanding in politics, has made them eager to sell their birthright for a pottage, and ignorant of the treasure they resigned.

At all times sincere friends of freedom have been rare, and its triumphs have been due to minorities, that have prevailed by associating themselves with auxiliaries whose objects often differed from their own; and this association, which is always dangerous, has been sometimes disastrous, by giving to opponents just ground of opposition, and by kindling dispute over the spoils in the hour of success. No obstacle has been so constant, or so difficult to overcome as uncertainty and confusion touching the nature of true liberty. If hostile interests have wrought much injury, false ideas have wrought still more; and its advance is recorded in the increase of knowledge as much as in the improvement of laws. The history of institutions is often a history of deception and illusions; for their virtue depends on the ideas that produce and on the spirit that preserves them; and the form may remain unaltered when the substance has passed away.

What he's saying is what we're dealing with today isn't something new. Words like Liberty and Freedom have been used and abused for centuries, warped to fit the needs of various institutional beliefs and values, to control, divide, and destroy people; the exact opposite of the very meaning of these words. Knowledge is the only force that can restore and protect the true meaning of these words.
"Rationalism belongs to the cool observer. But because of the stupidity of the average person, they follow not reason, but faith. This naive faith, requires necessary illusions and emotionally potent oversimplifications, which are provided by the myth maker to keep the ordinary person on course." - Reinhold Niebuhr



When the dust had cleared after the American Revolution, our Founding Fathers sought to design a Constitution centered around these very principles that many American patriots had fought and died for. One of the most famous Founding Fathers, James Madison, wrote in Federalist No. 51, one of his essays that pursuaded the states to ratify the Constitution:

"It is of great importance in a republic not only to guard the society against the oppression of its rulers, but to guard one part of the society against the injustice of the other part."

Over two centuries later, it's no secret that throughout American Government, from the electoral process and the lobbying in Washington, to the 5-4 split decisions by our Supreme Court on issues critical to protecting us from predatory corporations, has allowed for a small segment of the population to control and exploit a powerless majority (See Plutonomy: Buying Luxury, Explaining Global Imbalances). The meaning of Liberty and Freedom ultimately varies across the spectrum that is the social ladder; from the lowest on the todem pole having little if any, to the fat cat corporations at the top who wield nearly absolute power.

The government officals have established and used political parties with labels like Democrat and Republican to force Americans to take what they believe to be sides, while instead they've elected a bunch of representatives whose ideologies and interests are far from transparent or aligned with those their constituents. Then like a bad broken record that won't stop playing, a corporate controlled media slants issues (and when necessary facts) in whichever favor their controlling corporate interests demand to gain the favor and support of the unsuspecting and uninformed public, while Congress proceeds to bicker over the type of Band-Aid it should use to cover a gaping wound that needs major reconstructive surgery. Let's not forget how often they use words like Liberty and Freedom to gain popular support.... It's obvious Washington has become a tight-knit fraternity where everyone is much more concerned about who's hosting the best house parties and getting the best lobbying jobs than ensuring Liberty by eliminating corrupt officials and unjust, outdated, or ineffective legislation.

It's time for major reform, particularly in the way we elect representatives, and how they are allowed to represent us. Term limits need to be restructured, if not eliminated, and restrictions on age limits and social status to run for office must be removed. There is no reason why any American, regardless of physical attribute or social class, shouldn't have the ability to be on the ballot or chosen by the will of the people. Campaign contributions need to be regulated properly so that no candidate's voice can be drowned out and suppressed by the power of the corporate news media and the vast wealth of corporations.

America is in need of major Constitutional reconstruction to undue decades of malfeasance. Each branch must change how it does business, and every single law, treaty, and regulation needs to be reviewed, and changed or removed if necessary, to restore and ensure Liberty; to make just what's been long unjust, and properly address the realities that the majority of the people are faced with. The purpose of the American government cannot be to solely cater to the needs of never-ending consumption, particularly that of 1% of the population. It's time for a government that it is truly for the people, with modern consitutional safeguards and checks and balances. It's time to redesign and renew the foundations of our democracy to meet the challenges of today.



See Also:

Lawrence Lessig: Ctrl+Alt+Del

Is America A Corporatocracy?

For These People, By The People: The Corporate Takeover of U.S. Democracy

America's Invisible Slavery

18 comments:

  1. So true that's why so many people call themselves independent now. The MSM keeps feeding people whatever it is "they, the people in power want them to know". And to be honest people are afraid to talk about such things as not to go against the "big guy" i.e., government, corporations, military etc. From reading your bio you seem to be a smart guy; where do we the people start? The teabaggers started out with a campaign but now look like a bunch of people who are mad and crazy. No offense to you, but this country to so lawyered up again where do we start?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes there are many checks put on the people. Now when you want to take part in a march on Washington, the march is completely routed and designed in a manner to not disrupt the flow of commerce or the business of the city. These regulations and over-bureacratization has limited and in essence, placed a check on the people's ability to communicate with their govt (just one more example).

    I think we start with breaking the idea that an independent is someone on the line, unsure if they are going to vote democrat OR republican. We must break this mindset. We must change the definition of independent to someone who does not buy into this system at all, democrat OR Republican!

    ReplyDelete
  3. We start by getting the message out to educate the people, spreading truth. Then once enough people see what's going on, and we've gained enough support, challenging the system will be much more effective. We can publicly fight for what's right by challenging the constitutionality of unjust laws and restrictions on the electoral process (and we document it all, and share our experiences with the people to highlight these so-called "invisible" barriers). The only way we can do this is with lawyers who not only understand how to navigate the system but who are willing to stand up for what's right for this country, not their pockets...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes, the independent does seem to indicate someone on the line and you are absolutely correct in saying that we need to break this mindset. I think of independent as someone wanting justice. Look at what happened to the whisle blower at UBS he was the only one that went to jail. How sad is that; because the people in power wanted to make sure they got their word across not to play with them. This is what I'm saying. Look at Madoff - what he did was chump change in comparison to what the FED/Banks/Admin did to the American people. Look at when Martha went to jail; what a joke that was so that no one would even remember who the players were in Enron. Look at Blackwater corruption is so rampant. A march is great but truly we need something so much bigger than that. In response to Louis; how to we get the message out. And again you are playing with fire.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Blogging, and engaging in public debate on sites like the Huffington Post are just a few examples of ways to start spreading the truth. Once I get my license to practice law, I will take this battle to the courtroom. I've been spending most of law school developing my trial advocacy skills.

    Remember this my anonymous friend: anyone who fights for Liberty must be prepared to face the wrath of the tyranny of evil. I'm not afraid.

    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
    - Thomas Jefferson

    "Give me Liberty, or give me Death!"
    - Patrick Henry

    ReplyDelete
  6. Amen and bless your heart. I'll keep posting here to keep in touch.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I believe the ONLY way we will regain control of our government is through publicly-funded elections, making legislators accountable to us, not their campaign contributors. I am proposing public funding for candidates getting X numbers of signatures on nominating petitions. Yes, that means some of my tax dollars are likely to go toward funding the campaign of a candidate whose positions I disagree with. If that means the end of corporate control, I would consider that the biggest bargain since the Louisiana Purchase. Some adjustments would be needed for large districts, such as the one in which I live, NM CD-2. I am further proposing limiting campaign periods to six weeks, with a resting period one week before voting. Any campaign violating that rule would be automatically disqualified. Further, I am proposing that voting be conducted on Saturdays, as the traditional agrarian society reasons for voting on Tuesday no longer apply.
    People are angry, feeling that the system no longer works for them, and they're right. I am encouraging everyone to read David Cay Johnston's books, Free Lunch, and Perfectly Legal, to understand how "the system" is ever-increaslingly rigged to the advantage of the rich and powerful, to the detriment of the rest of us.
    How do we get a movement started to require public funding of campaigns, nationwide? Could we get Rep. Alan Grayson to spearhead the idea? The media seems quite taken with him..

    ReplyDelete
  8. That's like asking someone who has been found guilty to pick their sentence.. it's not going to happen. This is why I was so disappointed by the Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United... Where are the supposed checks and balances on Congress? This is why there needs to be critical reform in not just campaign financing, but the entire electoral process.

    Do you know how many people are running for office in Venezuela this year? Around 4,000...Anyone has the opportunity to participate in government, like it should be... http://venezuelanalysis.com/news/5192

    Yet Hugo Chavez is a dictator? All he did was make it possible for the people to re-elect him as many times as they want. If it is the will of the people to have a certain leader for 10, 20 years, or however long...why not honor the will of the majority?

    The Founding Fathers, as noble and righteous as they were, explicitly stated that the wealthy elite, the "ruling class" was the only people fit for the job, and they designed a system that kept the 1% in control. This system was also designed to fit a spread out, divided people, with wide ranges of ideologies and beliefs, and extremely slow means of communication for the exchange of information. That might have been the case in the 18th century, but as we've evolved, the government must evolve with us to meet the challenges we face as more technologically proficient, modernized, and civilized people.

    ReplyDelete
  9. So the founding fathers not so much noble and righteous; since slaves had to build the white house and such even though they had the money to hire people for the job being the 1%. This system has been corrupt since day one.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Not to be random.... But what is going on with Israel? What is the true connection with the US? I don't want to sound cranky but once again the news is just ugly.

    ReplyDelete
  11. right now you have a conflict of interests which is the American image in the foreign policy circle and the needs of the interests of the state of Israel (mainly, military industrial complex and real estate industry, (ie the settlements). Its going to be interesting to see how this admin can deal with it...i would not be surprised to see Israel go out of control and bomb lebanon or advance into the west bank and cause more havoc, without even a slap on the wrist from the intl community. Of course, we will rearm them, while paying for the damage on the Lebanese/Palestinian side (shouldnt Israel have to fix what they broke?)

    ReplyDelete
  12. Louis,
    what is your take on the shadow elite. HP has an article today re:neocons?

    ReplyDelete
  13. My take on Israel is to start cutting funding to them. Why should everyone else get punished and a Isreal gets scolded verbally but continues to get our tax dollars. Although no one will take Isreal on for fear of being called anti semitic. I fear that you are right, Isreal will bomb Lebanon, Iran and so on and the international community will do NOTHING about it and that's truly sad.

    ReplyDelete
  14. More than £1tn may have flowed out of Africa illegally over the last four decades, most of it to western financial institutions, according to a new report.

    Even using conservative estimates, the continent lost about $1.8tn (£1.18tn) – meaning Africans living at the end of 2008 had each been deprived of an average of $989 (£649) since 1970, according to the US-based research body Global Financial Integrity (GFI).

    The report says globally in recent years much attention has been focused on corruption – the proceeds of bribery and theft by government officials – and this only makes up about 3% of the cross-border flow of illicit money around the world. The proceeds of commercial tax evasion, mainly through trade mis-pricing, contribute 60% to 65% of the global total, while drug trafficking, racketeering and counterfeiting make up 30% to 35%. The report says Africa's percentages are likely to be roughly the same.

    The scourge eats into Africa's total GDP, says the report, Illicit Financial Flows from Africa: Hidden Resource for Development. Losses rose from around 2% of GDP in 1970 to a peak of 11% in 1987, then dropped below 4% for much of the Nineties, only to increase again to 8% of GDP in 2007 and 7% in 2008.

    The GFI says that existing research shows that most flows to western financial institutions, and calls on G20 members to crack down on international banks and offshore financial centres.

    Illicit outflows from Africa grew at an average 11.9% a year over the four decades. Some of this is attributed to oil price rises and increased opportunities to mis-price trade.

    "It is not unreasonable to estimate total illicit outflows from the continent across the 39 years at some $1.8tn," writes Raymond Baker, director of the GFI.

    "This massive flow of illicit money out of Africa is facilitated by a global shadow financial system comprising tax havens, secrecy jurisdictions, disguised corporations, anonymous trust accounts, fake foundations, trade mis-pricing and money laundering techniques."

    This capital loss has a devastating effect on development and attempts to alleviate poverty, the report says. Even by a more conservative estimate, using accepted economic models from the World Bank and the IMF, Africa has lost $854bn in cumulative capital flight between 1970 and 2008, the report notes. This would be enough to not only wipe out its 2008 external debt of $250bn but potentially leave $600bn for poverty alleviation and economic growth.

    "Instead, cumulative illicit flows from the continent increased from about $57bn in the decade of the 1970s to $437bn over the nine years 2000-2008."

    Africa lost around $29bn a year between 1970 and 2008, of which the Sub-Saharan region accounted for $22bn. On average, fuel exporters including Nigeria lost capital at the rate of nearly $10bn a year. "The impact of this structure and the funds it shifts out of Africa is staggering. It drains hard currency reserves, heightens inflation, reduces tax collection, cancels investment, and undermines free trade. It has its greatest impact on those at the bottom of income scales in their countries, removing resources that could otherwise be used for poverty alleviation and economic growth."

    It says that the huge outflow explains why aid efforts to reduce poverty have underachieved in Africa. "According to recent studies by GFI and other researchers, developing countries lose at least $10 through illegal flight capital for every $1 they receive in external assistance."

    ReplyDelete
  15. This is a MUCH more important probe... why are you not posting a story about it?!?

    Chaffetz and Issa Seek Information on Fannie Mae Executives Inventing New Cap & Trade System

    Press release: http://chaffetz.house.gov/2010/05/chaffetz-and-issa-seek-information-on-fannie-mae-executives-inventing-new-cap-trade-system.shtml

    Letter: http://chaffetz.house.gov/Letter.pdf

    Washington, DC—Today, Rep. Chaffetz (R-UT), along with Rep. Issa (R-CA) sent a letter to David Kappos, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, as well as Michael Williams, President and CEO of Fannie Mae, seeking information concerning a patent issued to Fannie Mae regarding a residential Cap and Trade system.

    “I have serious questions about why Fannie Mae, back in 2005, was working on a Cap and Trade scheme,” said Rep. Chaffetz. “Why would they be spending their resources on something that is well outside of the scope of Fannie Mae’s charter? We want to see all the information relating to the patents issued to these ‘inventive’ former Fannie Mae executives?”
    Report Abuse
    Painesright | May 14, 2010 05:30 PM ET

    Continued from my first post...

    “Having ventured far beyond sub-prime lending policies, Fannie Mae appears to have served as a full-blown liberal think tank for crony-capitalist ideas,” said Rep. Issa. “While the crony-capitalist Democrats who ran Fannie Mae like Franklin Raines and Jim Johnson used these kinds of ideas to enrich themselves, it was the American taxpayers who were left holding the bag after they failed. It’s disturbing that Fannie Mae executives were positioning themselves in 2005 for financial gain from an Obama Administration cap-and-trade system, but given the huge amount of campaign contributions Fannie Mae poured over President Obama it should be no surprise.”

    Follow the money:
    American Power Act
    Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX)
    Barack Obama
    Valerie Jarrett
    Goldman Sachs
    Al Gore
    Camco International Ltd
    Fannie Mae
    Franklin Raines
    Emerald Cities
    The Joyce Foundation
    Apollo Alliance
    Van Jones
    Joel Rogers
    Maurice Strong

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hi, Just curious on your take of the latest economic and geopolitical affairs. Any thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
  17. The Occupy Movement is akin to a long awaited Slave Uprising. The world is in need of REAL change and the defenders of the status quo will stop at nothing to prevent it.

    Occupy Everywhere.

    "The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish." - Charlie Chaplin

    ReplyDelete